Плотникова Е.А., Воронин А.Н. Психологические возможности и ограничения применения искусственного интеллекта в подготовке психологов

Научная статья
УДК 159.92
https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2026.9.3
 

Психологические возможности и ограничения

применения искусственного интеллекта

в подготовке психологов

 

Евгения Александровна Плотникова¹, Анатолий Николаевич Воронин^2
1,2Государственный академический университет гуманитарных наук, Москва, Россия,
¹evgeniiapsy@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-2051
²voroninan@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-9726
 
Аннотация. Цель статьи – анализ психологических возможностей и ограничений применения искусственного интеллекта в подготовке психологов на основе данных современных эмпирических исследований. Рассматривается эволюция ИИ в образовании. На основе мета-анализа Чжана и соавторов (Zhang et al., 2025) показано, что интегрированная когнитивная и эмоциональная поддержка ИИ дает наибольший эффект на усвоение знаний. В обзоре Брасслера и Криса (Braßler, Krys, 2026) выделены психологические функции генеративного ИИ. На основе обзора Прежана и соавторов (Prégent et al., 2025) систематизированы барьеры внедрения ИИ. Обоснована необходимость формирования у будущих психологов метакомпетенции критического диалога с ИИ. Сделан вывод, что ИИ является эффективным инструментом, дополняющим, но не заменяющим человеческое взаимодействие в подготовке психологов.
Ключевые слова: искусственный интеллект, большие языковые модели, подготовка психологов, метакомпетенция, психологические возможности, психологические ограничения, критический диалог
Финансирование: Статья подготовлена в Государственном академическом университете гуманитарных наук в рамках государственного задания Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации, тема № FZNF-2026-0004 «Цифровизация и ее влияние на современное общество и культуру: когнитивные, правовые, экономические вызовы и перспективы».
Для цитирования: Плотникова Е.А., Воронин А.Н. Психологические возможности и ограничения применения искусственного интеллекта в подготовке психологов // Общество: социология, психология, педагогика. 2026. № 9. С. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2026.9.3.
 
Original article
 

Psychological Possibilities and Limitations

of Using Artificial Intelligence

in the Training of Psychologists

 

Evgeniya A. Plotnikova¹, Anatoly N. Voronin^2
1,2State Academic University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia,
¹evgeniiapsy@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-2051
²voroninan@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-9726
 
Abstract. The article aims to analyze the psychological opportunities and limitations of using artificial intelligence in the training of psychologists drawing on the recent empirical studies data. It examines the evolution of AI in education. A meta-analysis by Zhang et al. (2025) demonstrates that integrated cognitive and emotional support provided by AI yields the greatest outcome for knowledge acquisition. A review by Brassler and Krys (2026) highlights the psychological functions of generative AI, while a review by Prégent et al. (2025) systematizes the barriers to AI implementation. The paper substantiates the need to foster a “critical dialogue with AI” meta-competence in future psychologists. It concludes that AI serves as an effective tool that complements rather than replaces human interaction in the training of psychologists.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, large language models, psychologist training, meta-competence, psychological opportunities, psychological limitations, critical dialogue
Funding: The article has been prepared at the State Academic University for the Humanities within the state task from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, the theme No. FZNF-2026-0004 “Digitalization and Its Influence on the Modern Society and Culture: Cognitive, Legal, Economic Challenges and Prospects”.
For citation: Plotnikova, Е.А. & Voronin, A.N. (2026) Psychological Possibilities and Limitations of Using Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Psychologists. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. (9), 29–36. Available from: doi:10.24158/spp.2026.9.3 (In Russian).

© Плотникова Е.А., Воронин А.Н., 2026

Список источников:
 
Бойко О.М., Медведева Т.И., Воронцова О.Ю., Ениколопов С.Н. ChatGPT в психотерапии и психологическом консультировании: обсуждение возможностей и ограничений // Новые психологические исследования. 2025. Т. 5. № 1. С. 26–55. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2025_05_01_02.
Воронин А.Н., Палёнова В.В. Будущее психологии: эффективное взаимодействие с ChatGPT возможно? // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2024. Т. 21. № 3. С. 831–857. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-3-831-857.
Ивахненко Е.Н., Никольский В.С. ChatGPT в высшем образовании и науке: угроза или ценный ресурс? // Высшее образование в России. 2023. Т. 32. № 4. С. 9–22. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22.
Корж Е.М., Громова А.В. Потенциал применения технологий искусственного интеллекта в психологии // Системная психология и социология. 2023. № 2 (46). С. 60–70. https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2023.46.2.5.
Куликова С.С., Яковлева О.В. Педагогическое управление в цифровой образовательной среде: вопросы профессиональной подготовки будущих педагогов // Образование и наука. 2022. Т. 24. № 2. С. 48–83. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-2-48-83.
Палёнова В.В. Копинг-стратегии в условиях коммуникативных сбоев при взаимодействии с чат-ботами // Наукосфера. 2025. № 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17037002.
Bin-Nashwan S.A., Sadallah M., Bouteraa M. Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance // Technology in Society. 2023. Vol. 75. Art. 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370.
Braßler M., Krys S. Generative AI supports psychology education through authentic simulation, adaptive scaffolding and critical reflection // Discover Psychology. 2026. Vol. 6. Art. 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-026-00753-0.
Halliday S., Lavis T., Callaghan P., Chur-Hansen A. Generative AI in higher education psychology programs: a scoping review exploring the opportunities for its use in assessment methods // Australian Psychologist. 2026. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2025.2580236.
Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial intelligence in education. 2023. P. 621–653. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068.
Kasneci E., Seßler K., Küchemann S., Bannert M., Dementieva D., Fischer F., Gasser U., Groh G., Günnemann S., Hüllermeier E., Krusche S., Kutyniok G., Michaeli T., Nerdel C., Pfeffer J., Poquet O., Sailer M., Schmidt A., Seidel T., Kasneci G. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education // Learning and Individual Differences. 2023. Vol. 103. Art. 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
Kjell O.N.E., Kjell K., Schwartz H.A. Beyond rating scales: With targeted evaluation, large language models are poised for psychological assessment // Psychiatry Research. 2024. Vol. 333. Art. 115667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115667.
Mishra P., Henriksen D., Woo L., Oster N. Control vs. Agency: Exploring the History of AI in Education // TechTrends. 2025. Vol. 69. P. 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01064-2.
Papert S. Mindstorms–Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York, 1980.
Pekrun R. Control-Value Theory: From Achievement Emotion to a General Theory of Human Emotions // Educational Psychology Review. 2024. Vol. 36. Art. 83. P. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09909-7.
Prégent J., Chung V.H.-A., El Adib I., Désilets M., Hudon A. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry and Psychology Education: Scoping Review // JMIR Medical Education. 2025. Vol. 11. Art. e75238. https://doi.org/10.2196/75238.
Rismanchian S., Doroudi S. The Evolution of Research on AI and Education Across Four Decades: Insights from the AIxEd Framework // International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2025. Vol. 35. P. 2797–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00483-9.
Sallam M. ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns // Healthcare. 2023. Vol. 11. No. 6. Art. 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887.
Shubina I. Exploring the utility of ChatGPT in psychology: Applications in domains of education, research, and practice // International Journal of Technology in Education. 2026. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 127–152. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.5737.
Taskin Bedizel N.R. Evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) and assessment in education: A bibliometric analysis // International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2023. Vol. 10. P. 208–223. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1369290.
Zhang H., Liu Y., Jiang M., Chen J., Wang M., Paas F. Emotional Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Educational Psychology Review. 2025. Vol. 37. Art. 106. P. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10086-4.
 
References:
 
Bin-Nashwan, S.A., Sadallah, M. & Bouteraa, M. (2023) Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society. 75, Article 102370. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370.
Boiko, O.M., Medvedeva, T.I., Vorontsova, O.Yu. & Enikolopov, S.N. (2025) ChatGPT in Psychotherapy and Counseling: Discussion of Opportunities and Limitations. New Psychological Research. 5 (1), 26–55. Available from: doi:10.51217/npsyresearch_2025_05_01_02 (In Russian)
Braßler, M. & Krys, S. (2026) Generative AI supports psychology education through authentic simulation, adaptive scaffolding and critical reflection. Discover Psychology. 6, Article 159. Available from: doi:10.1007/s44202-026-00753-0.
Halliday, S., Lavis, T., Callaghan, P. & Chur-Hansen, A. (2026) Generative AI in higher education psychology programs: a scoping review exploring the opportunities for its use in assessment methods. Australian Psychologist. 61 (2), 115–126. Available from: doi:10.1080/00050067.2025.2580236.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M. & Fadel, C. (2023) Artificial Intelligence in Education. pp. 621–653. Available from: doi:10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068.
Ivakhnenko, E.N. & Nikol’skii, V.S. (2023) ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: A Threat or a Valuable Resource? Higher Education in Russia. 32 (4), 9–22. Available from: doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22 (In Russian)
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T. & Kasneci, G. (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences. 103, Article 102274. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
Kjell, O.N.E., Kjell, K. & Schwartz, H.A. (2024) Beyond rating scales: With targeted evaluation, large language models are poised for psychological assessment. Psychiatry Research. 333, Article 115667. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115667.
Korzh, E.M. & Gromova, A.V. (2023) The Potential of Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Psychology. Systems Psychology and Sociology. (2 (46)), 60–70. Available from: doi:10.25688/2223-6872.2023.46.2.5 (In Russian)
Kulikova, S.S. & Yakovleva, O.V. (2022) Pedagogical Management in the Digital Educational Environment: Issues of Professional Training for Future Teachers. Education and Science Journal. 24 (2), 48–83. Available from: doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2022-2-48-83 (In Russian)
Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., Woo, L. & Oster, N. (2025) Control vs. Agency: Exploring the History of AI in Education. TechTrends. 69, 247–253. Available from: doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01064-2.
Palenova, V.V. (2025) Coping Strategies in Communicative Breakdowns in Human-Chatbot Interaction. Naukosfera. (8 (2)). Available from: doi:10.5281/zenodo.17037002 (In Russian)
Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York.
Pekrun, R. (2024) Control-Value Theory: From Achievement Emotion to a General Theory of Human Emotions. Educational Psychology Review. 36, Article 83, 1–27. Available from: doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09909-7.
Prégent, J., Chung, V.H.-A., El Adib, I., Désilets, M. & Hudon, A. (2025) Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry and Psychology Education: Scoping Review. JMIR Medical Education. 11, Article e75238. Available from: doi:10.2196/75238.
Rismanchian, S. & Doroudi, S. (2025) The Evolution of Research on AI and Education Across Four Decades: Insights from the AIxEd Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 35, 2797–2820. Available from: doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00483-9.
Sallam, M. (2023) ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare. 11 (6), Article 887. Available from: doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887.
Shubina, I. (2026) Exploring the utility of ChatGPT in psychology: Applications in domains of education, research, and practice. International Journal of Technology in Education. 9 (1), 127–152. Available from: doi:10.46328/ijte.5737.
Taskin Bedizel, N.R. (2023) Evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) and assessment in education: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 10, 208–223. Available from: doi:10.21449/ijate.1369290.
Voronin, A.N. & Palenova, V.V. (2024) The Future of Psychology: Is Effective Interaction with ChatGPT Possible? RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 21 (3), 831–857. Available from: doi:10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-3-831-857 (In Russian)
Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Jiang, M., Chen, J., Wang, M. & Paas, F. (2025) Emotional Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 37, Article 106, 1–38. Available from: doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10086-4.